Weekly Regulatory Briefing (14)

Each week, we bring together the biggest updates in short-term rental regulations from coast to coast. Whether it’s fresh local regulations, emerging trends, or major discussions, our briefing provides all you need to stay in the know.

Each week, we bring together the biggest updates in short-term rental regulations from coast to coast. Whether it’s fresh local regulations, emerging trends, or major discussions, our briefing provides all you need to stay in the know.


🏡 Top Stories This Week


🌍 Regional Highlights


📜 New Ordinances Approved


💬 Catch Up on Discussions


Let’s Explore: Emerging Trends 🌱

In response to the evolving short-term rental (STR) landscape, communities are taking action to manage emerging challenges. Stricter enforcement, legal battles, and neighborhood-focused policies illustrate how STR regulations continue to adapt and influence local areas.

What this means:

🗺️ Stricter Local Regulations & Zoning Enforcement: Cities and towns are increasingly imposing stricter zoning laws on short-term rentals, with some banning them entirely in residential areas. Buffalo, NY, and Mentor, OH, have moved to prohibit or heavily restrict non-owner-occupied STRs, while East Hampton, NY, has paused enforcement to reassess its zoning rules. This reflects a growing effort by municipalities to limit the spread of STRs in neighborhoods and preserve long-term housing availability.

🚗 Enhanced Compliance & Penalties: Many regions are shifting toward stronger enforcement mechanisms, including fines, tax collection measures, and third-party monitoring. Clark County, NV, is implementing property liens for unpaid STR fines, while Peninsula Township, MI, has introduced direct fines for illegal rentals. Cities like Los Angeles and Steamboat Springs, CO, are also taking action against unlicensed STR operators, demonstrating a move toward more aggressive compliance strategies.

🚫 State vs. Local Control Battles: The debate over state versus local authority in regulating STRs continues to intensify, with local governments pushing back against state-level preemption. Richmond Heights, OH, has opposed Senate Bill 104, which would limit municipal control over STR regulations, while Connecticut’s HB-07238 is advancing efforts to create a statewide STR registry and tax structure. These conflicts highlight the ongoing power struggle between state governments seeking uniform policies and localities fighting to maintain control over housing regulations.


📅 Future Meetings and Public Hearings/Comments:

  • Park Township, MI: Officials postponed their decision until April 21 when another meeting will be held.
```
Public Meeting
Apr 21, 2025 - 5:00 PM
Park Township, MI
Local Council meeting. Vote scheduled? TBD.
```
Town Meeting
May 5, 2025 -
West Stockbridge, MA
Local Council meeting. Vote scheduled? TBD.
```
Planning Commission
May 6, 2025 - 19:00
Alexandria, VA
Planning Commission meeting. Vote scheduled? TBD.
Summary: Discussion on urban planning and development issues.

🖱️ Click of the Week: See What Everyone’s Reading

Is Eagle County too complex for a one-size-fits-all approach to short-term rental regulations?
Eagle County has been working on short-term rental regulations since 2022. The problem is the county’s complexity. Most of the short-term rentals in the county — 87% — are in Beaver Creek, and the resort…

Is Eagle County too complex for a one-size-fits-all approach to short-term rental regulations?

The Eagle County is evaluating potential short-term rental regulations, considering the needs of various areas, from high-density resort zones to smaller communities. Discussions focus on whether a one-size-fits-all approach is feasible, with suggestions for either countywide registration or more targeted measures.

Subscribe to STRisker - Short-term regulatory changes and news

Don’t miss out on the latest issues. Sign up now to get access to the library of members-only issues.
jamie@example.com
Subscribe