🎯 Strisker: Bulletin - Buena Vista, AR
A third and final reading on July 27 would tie the ceiling to the city's housing growth while owner-occupied rentals stay exempt from the cap entirely


Bella Vista Rejects Bid to Raise Short-Term Rental Cap, Keeping the Limit at 600
A third and final reading on July 27 would tie the ceiling to the city's housing growth while owner-occupied rentals stay exempt from the cap entirely
Photo by Rod Ramsell on Unsplash
Watch on Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h-8bn69VHmk
The Bella Vista City Council rejected a proposal to raise the city's cap on short-term rental permits from 600 to 687, defeating the measure on its third and final reading.
The vote leaves the existing 600-permit ceiling in place and shifts the debate to a separate track: a review of how densely short-term rentals may cluster in residential neighborhoods.
What the Council Decided
The ordinance would have amended Section 16-43 of the city code, the "active permit maximum," lifting the ceiling on non-owner-occupied permits from 600 to 687. Supporters framed the roughly 15% increase as keeping pace with housing growth and argued the original cap reflected a target of about 4% of the city's homes and that the housing stock has since grown.
Watch on Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cmmZ_pe4ALE
After extended public comment and council debate, the increase failed by a vote of 1-4 with one abstention. The cap therefore remains at 600 and because that limit is already reached, new non-owner-occupied applicants stay on a first-come waiting list. Owner-occupied rentals continue to fall outside the cap entirely.
The Vote and the Density Referral
Council Member Anna Isbell cast the lone vote in favor; Larry Wilms, Craig Honchell, Wendy Hughes, and Shea Newport voted against, while Travis Harp abstained. Immediately before that vote, the council approved 4-3, a resolution referring a possible zoning change on short-term rental density to the Planning Commission for a public hearing and recommendation with Mayor John Flynn breaking the tie.
Several members said they would not expand the cap before hearing that recommendation since 87 new permits could otherwise be issued anywhere in the city before any density rules exist.


What Stays in Effect
The current short-term rental rules are unchanged:
The Contested Ground
Public testimony ran roughly even with resident-hosts defending their records and neighbors describing clustering and turnover. Opponents pointed to concentration and noted that nearly half the lakefront homes on some streets are short-term rentals with that third-party data counting about 782 active listings citywide.


Several urged the council to match Fayetteville's roughly 1% standard rather than Bella Vista's 4%. Operators countered that the city logged only about seven police calls against roughly 21,000 reservations in 2025 and that the rentals feed local restaurants, shops, and services.
⦾ Status: Cap increase to 687 rejected July 27, 2026 (failed 1-4, one abstention, on third reading)
⦾ Permit cap: Stays at 600 non-owner-occupied permits; owner-occupied units exempt and uncapped
⦾ Registration/permit required: Yes; first-come waiting list, cap currently full
⦾ Fees: $50 owner-occupied (free renewal); $100 non-owner-occupied ($50 renewal)
⦾ Occupancy limit: 3 guests per bedroom; minimum 2 off-street parking spaces
⦾ Night cap: None
⦾ Primary residence requirement: No, though owner-occupied units fall outside the cap
⦾ Penalty for non-compliance: $250–$500 first offense, rising to $1,000-plus and permit loss on third
⦾ Platform responsibility: None; obligations fall on hosts
⦾ Transferable: No; reapplication required on change of ownership
In case you missed it:



Strisker News Tracker
Trying to keep up with STR and data center regulations across multiple cities and states? Our News Tracker makes it easier than ever. Filter by location, search a comprehensive database, and sort by impact level—this tool helps you focus on what matters most.
Stay Updated with STRisker!
STRisker offers tools and features to keep you updated with the Short Term Rental movement (and now Data Centers!) movement across the world.
👍 We’d love your feedback.
We're always looking for ways to improve Bulletins.
Was this one useful to you? Other topics you'd like to see get covered?
✉️ Just reply directly to this email. We read and respond to every message!
-Will McClure
🙋 P.S.
Know someone else who should be reading this Bulletin? Feel free to forward this along. We want to make sure operators and stakeholders are aware of regulatory changes in their area.


